The Time Travel Victor: Back To The Future III I mean, as far as time travel stories are concerned, I get it. So, they have to get the DeLorean in front of a train to push the car to that speed so Marty can get back home. The cool part, though, is that the DeLorean breaks down so it can’t reach 88 mph to time travel. Marty goes back to the past to save his friend. But it’s one of those, “Wait, what’s happening again?” kind of time travel films.īack To The Future III’s time travel is relatively simple. It makes a lot more sense when you just watch the movie. He also kills Marty’s father, forces Marty’s mom to marry him, and then Marty goes back to 1955, and…you know what. Biff then steals the time machine to go to the past to give his younger self the almanac. Okay…so Marty goes into the future and buys an almanac, but he leaves it behind and future Biff picks it up. But, which story makes it more interesting?
Time travel plays a huge role in both movies. I just love Biff, so no contest with this one. The Character Victor: Back To The Future II She’s Doc’s love interest, and while I do like her since she’s her own woman and doesn’t need a man, I feel like some of the plot centered around her sinks the whole movie. But one character who is new to the series-and who kind of sucks-is Clara Clayton, played by Mary Steenburgen. We get Buford “Mad Dog” Tannen, Maggie McFly (Lea Thompson) as well as others. I mean, you’d have to be a real butthead if you don’t like Biff Tannen.Īgain, a lot of the characters in II make their way in III, just ancestral versions.
We get to see him at all different stages of his life, and since Biff is probably my favorite character in the entire series, I bet you can already guess which sequel is my favorite when it comes to characters.
While Marty is still as cool as ever, and I do love future Doc Brown, Back to the Future II is the Biff show through and through.
Back to the future part iii putlockers movie#
A lot of the same characters appear in both sequels, but which movie uses them more effectively?
0 kommentar(er)
